Independent evidence before payment.
Do not buy this to take yourself.
This seller lists prescription-medicine ingredients, and we could not match it to any regulated route allowed to supply them.
If you need this medicine, get it from a pharmacy on the GPhC register.
Search the GPhC pharmacy registerResearch catalogue uses 2 prescription-medicine ingredient names; this is not a verified human-use route
Its domain was registered in August 2012 (about 14 years old); a matching active UK company is on the Companies House register (UK PEPTIDES LIMITED, 16964373); 5 of 8 transparency signals were found on its own published pages. With no independent lab results or verified community reviews yet, Litmus publishes these public-record facts but does not yet assign an overall trust score.
Decision first
Prescription-only, warned or investigational listings detected: Tesamorelin, PT-141. A research-only disclaimer does not make these approved consumer products.
UK PEPTIDES LIMITED (16964373). Company existence does not verify products or human-use legality.
A COA or exact batch report may describe research material; it cannot create an approved medicine or lawful prescription route.
Hard-to-fake records we checked at the source — registers, the ICANN domain record, independent lab verification, regulator actions.
Registered 30 Aug 2012 — 14 years ago, via Tucows Domains Inc.. The domain is over five years old; ownership and site continuity are not assumed.
How we checked · Domains under 12 months old are a new-seller caution. An older registration is context only because domains can change owners. The date comes from public ICANN RDAP.
Matches UK PEPTIDES LIMITED (company 16964373) on the UK Companies House register — active, incorporated 15 Jan 2026.
How we checked · An exact, active match on a public company register is a hard-to-fake positive. We only claim a match when a single active company exactly matches the brand.
The dated seller-catalogue snapshot uses 2 active-ingredient names also found in approved prescription medicines (Tesamorelin, PT-141); the research listing does not inherit the branded medicine's approval and is presented under a “research use only” disclaimer.
How we checked · A hard fail requires direct human-use or no-prescription conduct on the seller's site, or an official adverse event, plus a dated product-status receipt. An ingredient name never inherits a branded medicine's approval.
Potential medicines-law risk. Our dated catalogue check recorded 2 prescription-only medicines (Tesamorelin, PT-141) in a direct research-sales catalogue, while no regulated prescriber and dispensing-pharmacy route was matched. UK rules generally restrict the supply of prescription-only medicines. This is a factual risk flag, not a legal determination about the seller. The site uses a “research use only” label. That label does not itself establish that a sale complies with medicines law.
How we checked · We flag the observed catalogue facts against official medicines guidance. This is a prompt to check the regulator sources, not a legal judgment about the seller.
No independent lab results on file yet.
How we checked · Only independent HPLC/MS results count toward a lab score. A vendor's own certificates of analysis are shown but never unlock a score — they're too easy to cherry-pick.
No regulator actions against this vendor are on record in the sources we monitor.
How we checked · We surface published actions from the FDA, MHRA and other regulators. Absence reflects the sources we monitor, not a clean bill of health.
Circumstantial signals that are hard to fake at scale — operator fingerprints, what the seller publishes, payment routes.
5 of 8 transparency signals were published on the vendor's own site (crawled 9 Aug 2026).
How we checked · Counts only signals the vendor actually publishes — named lab, batch COAs, shipping origin, working support, and so on. “Not found” earns no credit but is never scored as a failure.
support page: https://www.uk-peptides.com/index.php?route=information/contact
Checked against the vendor's own published pages. “Unknown” means the fetched pages did not provide usable evidence; it is never a failed check.
No verified community reviews yet.
How we checked · We need at least 3 credible, non-manipulation reviews before any experience score is shown. Trustpilot-style star scores are excluded by design — they're the easiest signal to fake.
No shared-operator fingerprint was detected among the signals we checked.
How we checked · We look for shared naming, templates and infrastructure across brands. A clean result reflects the signals we checked, not a guarantee of independence.
Accepts: Card, Bank transfer, Cryptocurrency.
How we checked · Stable card processing means a payment processor did some KYC — a weak positive. Crypto-only / transfer-only payment is a caution because there is no chargeback recourse. Read from the seller's own published pages.
Shown for completeness only. A seller controls these completely, so they earn zero trust weight — a claim is not a verification.
Publishes its own certificate-of-analysis documents.
How we checked · A vendor-published COA is the vendor's own claim — cherry-pickable and copyable — so it earns no trust weight. It would move to Tier 1 only if the report number verified against the lab's own records.
Labels products “research use only” on its own site.
How we checked · A self-applied RUO label is the vendor's own wording. It earns no trust weight, and it does not change what the law requires for a prescription-only medicine.
States it ships from United Kingdom.
How we checked · Ship origin is self-reported by the seller and is not independently verified — displayed as their claim only.
We do not collect or display Trustpilot-style star scores for this or any seller.
How we checked · Star-review walls can be bought, brigaded or review-gated, and a real one can't be told from a manipulated one at source — so they earn zero trust weight here by design.
Links go to the compound's evidence page — we sell nothing and never link to a checkout.