We checked 96 peptide sellers.
9 of the 39 that say they are UK-based are not on any official register we could match.

9 of 39

UK sellers

say they are UK-based, and we could not match them to any official register

We check Companies House for companies and the GPhC register for pharmacies. Neither is a register of traders: a sole trader need not appear on either, and some businesses trade under a name that differs from the one they registered. This counts what we could not match, nothing more.

30 of 39

UK sellers

are matched to an official register — a company on Companies House, or a pharmacy on the GPhC register

A match proves a real, identifiable business exists and can be looked up. It says nothing about the products, the prices or whether anything sold is legal to take.

57 of 96

sellers we track

are based outside the UK, where we do not check any company register yet

This is a gap in our coverage, not a finding about those sellers. A US or EU seller may well be registered somewhere we do not currently look, so we do not count them either way.

9 of 56

sellers with a readable registration record

have a website registered less than a year ago

A new website is not wrongdoing — every business starts somewhere. It matters because a registration date is one of the few things a seller cannot backdate, so a brand-new address behind an established-looking brand is worth knowing.

6 of 96

sellers we track

share an operator fingerprint with another “independent” brand

A shared fingerprint means shared infrastructure, template or naming — not necessarily shared ownership. Each one is shown with the evidence on the seller's own page.

40 of 96

sellers we track

have no public domain-registration record we could read

This is a gap in what we can see, not a finding about the seller. It usually means a privacy service or a registry we do not yet query.